|
Written by Charles Edwards
|
|
Wednesday, 31 December 2008 13:55 |
|
I wanted to thank you all for your interest in the site and for the incredible response I've had to this from all over the world! Many thanks. Hopefully I'll get more time to dedicate to this AgileEA project during 2009, as 2008 has been a really busy and interesting year for me. May everyone who visits this site have a fantastic, peaceful and fruitful 2009! |
|
|
Written by Charles Edwards
|
|
Wednesday, 17 December 2008 13:42 |
|
Organisations have different levels of maturity in the area of Change Management Databases (CMDB’s). I was particularly looking to understand information like what does the WAN and LAN look like, what Servers and Client computers do we have in the estate, what Operating system and other Applications are running on these servers, etc? I wanted this information on a regular basis (daily to weekly) so that we could observe change and query information and have confidence that it was fully up to date. At one end of the spectrum some organisations couldn’t spell CMDB. On the other end of the spectrum an organisation might have a fully automated and integrated CMDB offering which it exposes to its Enterprise Architecture team to do “what-if” analysis, to understand the estate and to help continuously improve network and hardware designs, etc. We discovered an excellent Software-as-a-Service offering that is not designed as a CMDB, but primarily scans the network for vulnerabilities and security information. However it generates, as a by product of its security scanning, all the base information that an Enterprise Architecture practice can use. It draws up a visual diagram of the WAN and LAN, shows all the IP addresses and categorises all the information in terms of Infrastructure Software and Applications found. This information can then be exported out and brought into the Enterprise Architecture Models. The best part and the reason for the Blog is that except for a few strategically placed Black Box hardware items that get plugged into the wall on one end and the network on the other end, there is nothing to install! All the real work is done on the Remote (Software-as-a-Service) Servers in the cloud, over encrypted links to your organisation. The benefits of this are that you can get this installed extremely quickly and not have to alter any ways of working in your IT Operations and Production Environments. A quick win situation all round, without upsetting the Production people and getting really useful information rapidly. Check it out – www.Qualys.com |
|
Last Updated on Wednesday, 01 April 2009 22:32 |
|
Written by Charles Edwards
|
|
Sunday, 07 December 2008 00:00 |
|
Changes in this release are generally around: - Introduced some Strategy Elements.
- Renamed Segment Architecture to Theme Architecture
- Made it more Service Oriented.
- Introduced a new concept to Agile EA of Supplier and Vendor Management - for Outsourcing, SaaS, Vendor Licenses, etc.
- Refined elements of Service Governance.
Specifically the changes are: - Renamed the FEA term "Segment Architecture" to a more meaningful "Theme Architecture" and therefore
- Refactored the "Segment Architecture View" to "Theme Architecuture View" including all related sub-pages.
- Added a placeholder Task for "Identify Architecture Strategy for Segment"
- Defined a new Artefact called "Theme Architecture Strategy Description"
- Added a new Discipline called "Supplier & Vendor Management".
- Renamed "Define a Mission" to "Define an EA Mission"
- Renamed "Define a Vision" to "Define an EA Vision"
- Added a placeholder Task for "Manage Vendor Lisences" in the Supplier and Vendor Management discipline.
- Added a new Artefact called "Vendor License List"
- Added a new Role called "EA Vendor Architect"
- Renamed the "Logical Information Data Model" to "Information Systems Data Model" and changed some of the wording slightly.
- Added a new Artefact called "Themed Architecture Model"
- Added a new Task called "Define a Data Architecture Strategy"
- Renamed the Task "Define a Data Architecture" to "Define a Data Architecture Model"
- Renamed the Work Product "Technology Architectect" to "Infrastructure Technology Architectect"
- Renamed the Discipline "Technology Discipline" to "Infrastructure Technology Discipline"
- Created a role of "Enterprise Architect" as a generic overall role.
- Renamed the role of "Enterprise Services Architect" to "Services Architect"
- Renamed the role of "Solution Techical Architect" to "Project Solution Architect"
- Renamed the "To-Be Architecture Model View" to "Target Architecture (To-Be) Model View"
- Renamed the "As-Is Model View" to "Current (As-Is) Architecture Model View"
- Renamed the "Ensure Performance and Capacity" to "Ensure Non-Functional requirements are defined"
- Created a "Service Contract" Artefact - work product.
- Created a "Service Contract Template" Artefact - work product.
- A total of 783 elements in the Process.
|
|
Last Updated on Sunday, 07 December 2008 22:31 |
|
|
Written by Big Bruv
|
|
Saturday, 13 December 2008 12:47 |
|
This subject might seem a little removed from the topic of Enterprise Architecture, but I do feel it's pervasive concern for all Bloggers in all situations. The concept of "Freedom of Speech" for bloggers. Imagine if I blogged about a particular product or service that I thought was really poor, giving perfectly valid reasons, and then got sued huge money (for an individual anyway - in terms of both time and cash) by the company that I'd blogged about? Nightmare.  Well this has happened to my brother in South Africa. He blogged over a few months about a company called QVC - giving all the gory details of how he was phoned to go in and collect a Car he'd been told he had won, only to find out that he'd not won anything at all and that it was in fact a timeshare sales scam he'd been con'ed into going along to. When he blogged about it the company sued him for just under R500 000. It's made the Press and Radio and Blog sites all over South Africa and there is a huge outrage there, justifyably so I believe. Interestingly, this particular company and no doubt others, will in future have second thoughts about taking this trigger-happy and rather outdated bullying tactic, because the size and strength of the international community of bloggers who will and already have stood up for him against them. I particularly liked this blog on the subject: http://walterpike.com/2008/12/learning-the-hard-way-bloggers-court-case/ where Walter states that: " The lesson for business is that the power has shifted away from the company, the brand owner and the traditional authority. Its now in the hands of the customer, strong arm tactics won’t work. I am afraid that the lid has been removed and there is no replacing it. Check out these stories from the source Donn himself: http://donnedwards.openaccess.co.za/2008/11/blogger-freedoms-at-stake-here.html Join the Facebook Group to show support and see a link to all the other bloggers and resultant comments here: http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/group.php?gid=47897759702 |
|
Last Updated on Saturday, 13 December 2008 13:20 |
|
Written by Charles Edwards
|
|
Tuesday, 18 November 2008 10:04 |
|
I find it incredible in this day and age that people feel the need to have a table near the beginning of a document with a column for Sign Off! Since we first started writing Word (or other) documents, I have never gone to the network drive, opened a file and seen a signature in one- EVER! Even if the document is formally signed it is very rarely scanned back in and kept safely. Why do we bother? Who are we kidding? it's simply an old fashioned notion that we need to get over. |
|
Last Updated on Wednesday, 01 April 2009 23:02 |
|
|
|
|
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next > End >>
|
|
Page 4 of 8 |